<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The JavaFX 1.0 License &#8211; Completely unreasonable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/javafx-10-license-unreasonable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/javafx-10-license-unreasonable/</link>
	<description>Primarily about the Lobo web browser and the Cobra rendering engine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JavaFX Video in a Swing Application - Technically Doable &#171; Lobo Project Blog</title>
		<link>http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/javafx-10-license-unreasonable/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaFX Video in a Swing Application - Technically Doable &#171; Lobo Project Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] The JavaFX 1.0 License - Completely&#160;unreasonable? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The JavaFX 1.0 License &#8211; Completely&nbsp;unreasonable? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lobochief</title>
		<link>http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/javafx-10-license-unreasonable/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>lobochief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s my impression as well. Everything but the media codecs could easily get open sourced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s my impression as well. Everything but the media codecs could easily get open sourced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Herron</title>
		<link>http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/javafx-10-license-unreasonable/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>David Herron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I too don&#039;t understand why that license says what it says.  However our bossman recently posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.sun.com/meetjeet/entry/javafx_the_road_ahead&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JavaFX - The Road Ahead&lt;/a&gt; and hopefully you&#039;ve already read this.  It explains some issues around open sourcing JavaFX - such as no-way-no-how for the media codecs (we don&#039;t have the rights) but the rest of it will be opened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too don&#8217;t understand why that license says what it says.  However our bossman recently posted <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/meetjeet/entry/javafx_the_road_ahead" rel="nofollow">JavaFX &#8211; The Road Ahead</a> and hopefully you&#8217;ve already read this.  It explains some issues around open sourcing JavaFX &#8211; such as no-way-no-how for the media codecs (we don&#8217;t have the rights) but the rest of it will be opened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/javafx-10-license-unreasonable/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lobobrowser.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...]  The JavaFX 1.0 License - Completely unreasonable? We&#8217;re kicking off a brand new blog today, as you can see, and to do this I thought I&#8217;d discuss the JavaFX [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  The JavaFX 1.0 License &#8211; Completely unreasonable? We&#8217;re kicking off a brand new blog today, as you can see, and to do this I thought I&#8217;d discuss the JavaFX [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
